FrostshadeWC

I mean, you take into account inflation and this is the equivalent of getting the game for about $11.65 when it first released. It was $40 then, which comes out to a bit over $68 now...

Honestly I don't see the issue with the pricing. People will just complain about anything.

I loved Ash's final battle against Leon until Pokemon Horizons dropped- suddenly, there's a whole new region that's never been mentioned or seemed to have existed before now, and Ash cannot say he is a Pokemon master because we have no clue if he can beat the people there.

honestly, after seeing the Saros trailer at the game awards, I'm disappointed. It went from some beautiful cinematics that made me excited to a switch to some gameplay that just didn't look... Unique. Nothing stood out about it to me. I hope that that was just me judging some subpar gameplay or something.

set to right the movies wrongs, but they decided to cast a black man as Snape... Now, I'm all for diversifying the cast some. It would make a much more realistic depiction of Britain to do so. But deciding the cast the singular character who should not be black as a black man is an odd choice. Snape is characterized by being extremely pale, to the point of looking like he's a ghost. You can achieve this with a black man, but it just seems odd anyways.

**SPOILERS FROM HERE ON OUT**

the real issue is how it changes the story for James, Remus, and Sirius. They were already jerks for bullying Snape, but now Snape is black and they, or at least James, presumably are not. Now Harry Potter is at least a second generation racist, whose father bullied a black man just for the sake of it, and who immediately distrusts Snape upon meeting him on the basis of him looking suspicious and untrustworthy. Its like the casting is attempting to create new and more controversial conflict where there was already a fierce hatred and dislike between characters. They've turned a case of bullying and a spiteful teacher into a story that, even if not intended to be, will be interpreted as being about racism.

Joshua I've grown up Christian my whole life, so my parents adhered to the guidelines. It was beneficial for me in the long run I think. However, not my place to judge if others disagree- definitely depends on the kid. I hit seventeen, my parents let me get mature games, and I binged the entire Resident Evil series. My little brother hit seventeen, started GTA V, and decided that he hated the content. All depends in the end.

That would genuinely be hilarious.

I'm not sure I've ever met someone who actually follows ESRB recommendations, Obama might've been onto something.

Low-key hope this game gets delayed forever, purely because it would be funny from my perspective as someone uninterested in playing it lol

My biggest thing is the teamwork aspect- maybe its just me, but I always manage to find good teammates willing to communicate and work together. Can't find that in Marvel Rivals though, way to chaotic. More "Pick your favorite superhero who is a DPS", not "Pick a character beneficial to the team's composition"

controversial comments, such as using generative AI as intended, as a supplementary tool and not a replacement? The most controversial thing here twitter user's reading comprehension.

it's both strength and respect. It's stated both in the art book and by Horikoshi in interviews that Armored Deku is actually stronger than peak One For All Deku, plus he's just a guy everyone loves/who killed Shigaraki.

you forgot to factor that link has multiple canon means of coming back to life, so that should probably be taken into account

problem with both of these guys is that how strong they are in the games especially directly depends on the player...