Latest Posts (10)
See AllSubnautica 2 Publisher is Buying Out Employee Contracts After Becoming an 'AI-First' Company
AI has its uses, far more than most people will admit, but it's a tool, not a workforce replacement. What good is temporary boost to Krafton's bottom line when it's up for sale in a couple of years because the quality has plummeted and no one's buying its games anymore?
Fallout 76’s Floating CAMP Ban Controversy Explained
I think everyone would agree that active players should take precedence over Best Builds but that's not the reason people report floating CAMPs. The reason is that they're exploitive death traps. You spawn there without power armor and you fall to your death.
The reason why there are so many unfinished and crappy Best Builds is because Bethesda pushed Best Builds with daily and weekly challenges when they first came out. This encouraged players to submit CAMPs as Best Builds when they weren't worthy of the status.
Fallout 76’s Floating CAMP Ban Controversy Explained
Floating CAMPs are obviously an exploit, not a "technique", and using exploits have always been a ban bannable offense. When a ban occurs depends on the severity of the exploit used and the presence of other offenses. Usually Bethesda will announce a crackdown on exploits before doing mass bans.
The main reason that players create floating CAMPs is to kill unsuspecting players. CAMPs don't load before a player travels to them so there's nothing to support them mid-air and they fall hundreds of feet to their death unless they're wearing power armor. I guarantee this is the reason the CAMP had been reported, not some non-existent mass protest against Best Builds.
"It's not our intention to take action on C.A.M.P.s based on how they're built as long as they're not harming other players gameplay"
Using an exploit to kill players traveling to your CAMP "harm[s] other players gameplay". The community manager did not address this glaring issue when posting their response.
Try playing the game before "reporting" on it.
Star Trek: Lower Decks Offers an Alternate Explanation for Discovery's Klingons
Discovery made a huge mess of everything the show touched and I'd prefer the series to be explained away as existing in an alternate timeline just like Discovery did with the horrible Abrams movies (they even f'd up the Klingons in those as well).
The show runners have said that they're normal Klingons, they just shaved their heads because of some tradition that has them shave their heads while at war. The problem with that excuse was that they've never shaved their heads before in any series or movie when they were at war. The Discovery Klingons also had no hair before they went to war with the Federation. They used the tradition excuse to put hair on them and make small changes to their facial structure for season 2 to walk back their f-up.