Davis

Why don't people understand? There is no need for a top-down helldivers 2 mode, what the player base wants is more unique mission types with more content to play with. I genuinely don't understand why I keep seeing these articles that call for a top down mode when we are trying to move PAST that. Plus making the game less buggy would be more of a godsend than any sort of top-down game. If you want top-down Helldivers, just play the original game.

I feel like I am not alone in saying, the devs are trying to move FORWARD with their content. Making a game that is top down would never make it in today's market. Seeing as anyone I have heard who has played Helldivers 1 says the sequel is so much better mainly because it ISNT top down. Try to stay in touch with the playerbase, and your articles will start to gain popularity and more reactions.

So here is the major issue I found with this article. The first thing, there can only be one armor passive active on your helldiver per game, and it is directly connected to the armor you are wearing. The helmets provide no armor passives, (something I think they should change), but another thing is the lack of information around what the CEO is talking about. Please take notes and I hope you continue to post more articles in a better fasion about helldivers 2 with more information! Maybe try covering the possibility of new Automatons being introduced into the game with the failure of the next major order. Thank you for your time,

Davis

Hey! I don't think this article is entirely credible, due to the fact that they are saying Moon Knight has an overpowered ultimate, when it is easily dodged and is only ever a real threat to "squishies"(Supports) and its only something I have found really effective in destroying the backline of an enemy team. ( I have had countless moon Knight MVP's so I do know how to play the character.